Final Blog!

I think the blog experience was very unique. I had never done anything similar, and overall I would say that it was an effective method in engaging everyone in the topic at hand. Some discussions were more exciting than others, but that may have to do with varying personal interest in the topic being discussed. The fact that the blog groups were small made it more intimate and thus easier to express more about the readings. Overall, a good experience!

Comments

  1. USF MPH ClassNovember 16, 2018 at 6:30 PM

    Hi,
    Totally agree Hugo. They were beneficial and it kept us on topic and made us discuss the material amongst each other. Dan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

M3.4 Air Pollution

I currently live in Pinole, California, zip code 94564. After inputting this in the scorecard.org website, it provided the following information about Contra Costa county: Who and what are the top polluters in your zip code? Shell, Tesoro Refining, and Chevron are the top three polluters in Contra Costa county, each with around 1 million pounds of pollution released. What percent of the homes in your zip code have lead-based paint? 1% of houses in Contra Costa county are at high risk for lead hazard. Are there Superfund sites in your zip?  (In your BLOG, make sure to tell us what a Superfund Site is) Superfund sites are sites that produce the worst kind of toxic waste. In Contra Costa county, there are three: Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS), GBF, Inc., and United Heckathorn. However, Contra Costa county ranks among the 20% cleanest counties in all the country when it comes to number of superfund sites. What can you tell us about the Superfund sites that ...
Read more

M7.8 Topic of Interest: Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging

Image
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a branch dedicated to radiation safety called Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). This division has radiation safety programs that enforce requirements and encourage the safe use of radiation-emitting devices. These programs' goals are to keep professionals and the public informed about the risks of radiation exposure as well as ways to reduce such exposure and thus reduce the health risks associated with it. They do this by making sure that manufacturers make safe products, that users are educated about how to safely use devices that emit radiation, that users are educated about the risks of radiation exposure, and that regulators are able to obtain appropriate information about the use of such devices.
Read more

M4.5 Think about it

In order to reduce exposure to fragrances at work or at school, a marketing campaign could be put in place to discourage the use of fragrances at these locations. Posters and flyers could be distributed to spread the educational information of the adverse health effects of the chemicals in fragrances. Different cleaning requirements could be implemented so that scents are not able to stick on surfaces for too long. Installing good ventilation systems or designing buildings to have better natural ventilation could reduce the exposure to these harmful chemicals. As shown on one of our previous blog assignments, the fragrance component of many personal care products is usually the most harmful chemical in them, so reducing the use of these products (or encouraging the use of safer products instead) will have a great effect in diminishing the exposure to them. This, in turn, will potentially help alleviate ailments and symptoms that some people could be suffering from unknowingly as a resu...
Read more